From: The effect of weakened resilience on food insecurity in protracted crisis: the case of South Sudan
Effect | FCS | Point estimate | 95 % wald confidence limits | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age of HH head 1 versus 3 | 1 | 2.961 | 1.066 | 8.221 |
Age of HH head 1 versus 3 | 2 | 1.519 | 0.552 | 4.182 |
Age of HH head 2 versus 3 | 1 | 0.637 | 0.350 | 1.159 |
Age of HH head 2 versus 3 | 2 | 0.887 | 0.549 | 1.434 |
Gender of HH head 1 versus 2 | 1 | 0.679 | 0.527 | 0.874 |
Gender of HH head 1 versus 2 | 2 | 0.788 | 0.645 | 0.963 |
Household size 1 versus 3 | 1 | 2.151 | 1.415 | 3.270 |
Household size 1 versus 3 | 2 | 1.341 | 0.954 | 1.885 |
Household size 2 versus 3 | 1 | 1.683 | 1.281 | 2.210 |
Household size 2 versus 3 | 2 | 1.105 | 0.919 | 1.329 |
Cultivated crops 1 versus 2 | 1 | 0.649 | 0.472 | 0.891 |
Cultivated crops 1 versus 2 | 2 | 0.738 | 0.589 | 0.925 |
Owned livestock 1 versus 2 | 1 | >999.999 | >999.999 | >999.999 |
Owned livestock 1 versus 2 | 2 | >999.999 | >999.999 | >999.999 |
Fishing 1 versus 2 | 1 | 0.987 | 0.685 | 1.422 |
Fishing 1 versus 2 | 2 | 0.657 | 0.480 | 0.900 |
Livelihood 1 versus 4 | 1 | 0.583 | 0.429 | 0.793 |
Livelihood 1 versus 4 | 2 | 1.165 | 0.931 | 1.458 |
Livelihood 2 versus 4 | 1 | 0.431 | 0.287 | 0.647 |
Livelihood 2 versus 4 | 2 | 0.643 | 0.496 | 0.832 |
Livelihood 3 versus 4 | 1 | 0.893 | 0.646 | 1.235 |
Livelihood 3 versus 4 | 2 | 0.848 | 0.657 | 1.095 |