Skip to main content

Table 4 A summary of project’s average treatment effects on various self-reported outcomes

From: Does linking women farmers to markets improve food security? Evidence from rural Bangladesh

 

EJ (extension services)

NG (extension services and community marketing)

 

Coef

CG

Mean

Coef

CG

Mean

Monthly expenditure patterns

    

Decrease in food expenditures

– 0.278***

(0.031)

0.921

0.127***

(0.044)

0.702

Decrease in healthcare expenditures

– 0.109***

(0.040)

0.727

– 0.232***

(0.036)

0.933

Decrease in education expenditures

– 0.045

(0.035)

0.797

– 0.194***

(0.036)

0.850

Decrease in transportation expenditures

– 0.107**

(0.045)

0.605

– 0.515***

(0.034)

0.932

Food security and dietary diversity

    

HFIS

– 4.209***

(0.335)

6.104

0.116

(0.332)

1.941

HDDS

1.084***

(0.117)

7.088

0.359***

(0.132)

6.872

Homestead food production and marketing

    

Poultry rearing

0.113***

(0.043)

0.620

0.034

(0.035)

0.818

Quantity of poultryb

1.916

(1.894)

7.748

3.968***

(0.917)

7.131

Sale of poultryb

0.141***

(0.037)

0.113

0.181***

(0.048)

0.270

Vegetable Cultivation

0.301***

(0.040)

0.477

0.120**

(0.047)

0.462

Vegetable productiona, c

0.341**

(0.158)

3.582

0.209

(0.266)

4.350

Sale of vegetablec

0.089

(0.050)

0.278

0.196***

(0.069)

0.315

Obs

769

 

889

 
  1. CG mean: predicted comparison group means. Standard errors are bootstrapped using 300 replications of the model and reported in parenthesis. * denotes significance at 10 percent, ** at 5 percent, and *** at 1 percent level
  2. aValues are expressed in logarithm term
  3. bHouseholds that were involved in poultry rearing are used in calculating descriptive statistics
  4. cHouseholds that were involved vegetable cultivation are used in calculating descriptive statistics