Market system analysis | |
Evaluation question | Did the PfR motivate the private sector to overcome key constraints to developing an inclusive market? |
Metrics | Demand-side and supply-side constraints to market development [FS] Role of enabling environment in promoting or constraining development of market [FS] |
Evaluation question | Did the PfR engage the private sector? |
Metrics | Numbers of market actors competing and number that win the prize [FS] Type of market actors that compete and type that win (e.g., large companies, traders)[FS] Private sector actors' business cases for investment in market [FS] |
Evaluation question | Did PfR lead to the development of an inclusive and sustainable market? |
Metrics | Percentage of target product produced or transacted in the relevant market area Participation of smallholder farmers, women and other marginalized groups relative to their presence in the relevant market area Competitor’s demonstrated engagement or intent to continue to engage in the market |
Causal impact analysis | |
Evaluation question | Did the PfR lead to technology adoption by farmers? |
Metrics | Farmers’ knowledge, attitude, practices regarding the technology Farmers' adoption of technology Differential impacts on adoption for vulnerable subgroups |
Evaluation question | Did the PfR lead to improved farmer well-being? |
Metrics | Farmer well-being Differential impacts on well-being for vulnerable subgroups |
Cost-effectiveness analysis | |
Evaluation question | Was the PfR cost-effective? |
Metrics | Prize amounts paid as a proportion of costs of prize amounts paid, project design, management and verification [FS] Cost per persons reached, volumes traded Costs per unit of 'result' (“R” in PfR) achieved Costs per unit of final outcomes measured |