Skip to main content

Table 3 The respondents rating of changes to access to seed between 2016 and 2019

From: Assessing sustainability factors of farmer seed production: a case of the Good Seed Initiative project in Tanzania

Statement

Dodoma

Reason for rating

Arusha

Reason for rating

Seed is currently easily accessible

Agree

Farmer seed producers are located within the communities and seed is easily accessible

Agree

The emergence of agro-dealers locally, improving seed accessibility

Seed is of better quality compared to 2016

Not sure

Seed users agreed that seed is of better quality now, while seed producers disagreed, citing increased seed recycling and lack of quality assurance

Agree

Increased knowledge and skills in seed production, processing, and good agricultural practices

Seed is cheaper and affordable compared to 2016

Agree

Consumers buy seed from within their communities, and it is cheaper due to local availability

Disagree

Seed producers do not sell seed locally, so farmers buy from agro-dealers at prevailing prices

Most farmers can produce quality seed

Agree

Vegetable growers gained knowledge on the value of quality seed, and applied positive selection to produce their seed

Disagree

Seed production is done on contract, only by farmers trained and contracted by seed companies

There is access to sufficient quantities of seed

Agree

There are many seed producers, hence it is possible to obtain enough seed locally

Disagree

Local agro-dealers do not have sufficient quantities and also lack variety

Seed is obtainable within a reasonable proximity

Agree

Seed producers are found locally

Agree

There is an emergence of local agro-dealer shops within reach of farmers

Seed is available in time for critical sowing periods

Agree

Seed is available locally, and users can access it even on credit to cushion cash flow challenges at critical sowing times

Disagree

Farmers still have to buy seed from agro-dealers and sometimes they lack cash at the time of sowing

There is increased demand for AIV seed

Agree

Awareness of the value of quality seed increased demand for seed

Agree

Awareness of the value of quality seed increased demand for seed

  1. Responses reflect the rating by a majority of the participants in FGDs across the groups. It should be noted that seed producers were also vegetable producers and utilized their own produced seed for their seasonal production. The ratings may therefore be confounded by prior knowledge, especially among seed producers