Skip to main content

Table 6 Household diet diversity accessed through purchased channel (mixed-effects negative binomial regression)

From: Food security in rural Burkina Faso: the importance of consumption of own-farm sourced food versus purchased food

 Lean periodaFlush period
Intercept1.23 (0.98, 1.47)*1.82 (1.48, 2.13)*
Household head literacya0.03 (− 0.07, 0.13)0.01 (− 0.07, 0.09)
Household head genderc0.08 (− 0.12, 0.26)0.02 (− 0.13, 0.17)
Household inhabitants (adult eq.)0.01 (0.00, 0.02)*0.00 (− 0.01, 0.01)
Gross farm income (‘000 USD year−1)0.00 (0.00, 0.01)0.00 (0.00, 0.00)
Off-farm income earnedb0.11 (0.00, 0.23)*0.04 (− 0.06, 0.15)
Relative female control (> 40% calories year−1)0.02 (− 0.17, 0.21)− 0.07 (− 0.21, 0.07)
Number of crop species0.04 (0.00, 0.09)*0.01 (− 0.02, 0.05)
Number of livestock species− 0.02 (− 0.05, 0.02)0.01 (− 0.07, 0.09)
Provinced− 0.36 (− 0.53, − 0.18)*0.00 (− 0.37, 0.38)
Off-farm income earned: province0.20 (0.03, 0.36)*NS
  1. Estimates are presented as posterior β estimate and 95% credible interval (CI)
  2. * CI does not cross zero
  3. aObservations with no purchased food in the ‘lean’ period removed (n = 8 from Yatenga province)
  4. bReference category for dichotomous variable is ‘no’ (0), alternative is ‘yes’ (1)
  5. cReference category is ‘male’, alternative is ‘female’
  6. dReference category is Yatenga province, alternative is Seno
\