Skip to main content

Table 3 Household diet diversity (mixed-effects negative binomial regressions)

From: Food security in rural Burkina Faso: the importance of consumption of own-farm sourced food versus purchased food

 Lean periodFlush period
Intercept1.25 (1.00, 1.51)*1.97 (1.74, 2.20)*
Household head literacya0.06 (− 0.04, 0.16)0.02 (− 0.05, 0.10)
Household head genderb0.09 (− 0.09, 0.26)0.01 (− 0.15, 0.13)
Household inhabitants (adult eq.)0.01 (− 0.01, 0.02)0.00 (− 0.01, 0.01)
Gross farm income (‘000 USD year−1)0.01 (− 0.06, 0.08)0.02 (− 0.01, 0.04)
Off-farm income earneda0.13 (0.00, 0.25)*0.05 (− 0.04, 0.14)
Relative female control (> 40% income year−1)0.04 (− 0.15, 0.23)− 0.03 (− 0.17, 0.12)
Number of crop species0.05 (0.01, 0.09)*0.01 (− 0.03, 0.04)
Number of livestock species0.00 (− 0.04, 0.03)0.01 (− 0.01, 0.04)
Provincec− 0.30 (− 0.52, − 0.08)*− 0.02 (− 0.25, 0.22)
Gross farm income: off-farm income earned0.02 (− 0.06, 0.11)NS
Gross farm income: province− 0.10 (− 0.19, − 0.01)*NS
Off-farm income earned: province0.07 (− 0.11, 0.25)NS
Gross farm income: off-farm income earned: province0.16 (0.04, 0.28)*NS
  1. Estimates are presented as posterior β estimate and 95% credible interval (CI)
  2. * CI does not cross zero
  3. aReference category for dichotomous variable is ‘no’ (0), alternative is ‘yes’ (1)
  4. bReference category is ‘male’, alternative is ‘female’
  5. cReference category is Yatenga province, alternative is Seno
\