Skip to main content

Table 3 Household diet diversity (mixed-effects negative binomial regressions)

From: Food security in rural Burkina Faso: the importance of consumption of own-farm sourced food versus purchased food

  Lean period Flush period
Intercept 1.25 (1.00, 1.51)* 1.97 (1.74, 2.20)*
Household head literacya 0.06 (− 0.04, 0.16) 0.02 (− 0.05, 0.10)
Household head genderb 0.09 (− 0.09, 0.26) 0.01 (− 0.15, 0.13)
Household inhabitants (adult eq.) 0.01 (− 0.01, 0.02) 0.00 (− 0.01, 0.01)
Gross farm income (‘000 USD year−1) 0.01 (− 0.06, 0.08) 0.02 (− 0.01, 0.04)
Off-farm income earneda 0.13 (0.00, 0.25)* 0.05 (− 0.04, 0.14)
Relative female control (> 40% income year−1) 0.04 (− 0.15, 0.23) − 0.03 (− 0.17, 0.12)
Number of crop species 0.05 (0.01, 0.09)* 0.01 (− 0.03, 0.04)
Number of livestock species 0.00 (− 0.04, 0.03) 0.01 (− 0.01, 0.04)
Provincec − 0.30 (− 0.52, − 0.08)* − 0.02 (− 0.25, 0.22)
Gross farm income: off-farm income earned 0.02 (− 0.06, 0.11) NS
Gross farm income: province − 0.10 (− 0.19, − 0.01)* NS
Off-farm income earned: province 0.07 (− 0.11, 0.25) NS
Gross farm income: off-farm income earned: province 0.16 (0.04, 0.28)* NS
  1. Estimates are presented as posterior β estimate and 95% credible interval (CI)
  2. * CI does not cross zero
  3. aReference category for dichotomous variable is ‘no’ (0), alternative is ‘yes’ (1)
  4. bReference category is ‘male’, alternative is ‘female’
  5. cReference category is Yatenga province, alternative is Seno