Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of CRS regression analysis for earthen pond, cage culture and plastic tank

From: Comparative analysis of technical efficiency of catfish farms using different technologies in Lagos State, Nigeria: a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach

Variable

Earthen pond (EP)

Cage culture (CC)

Plastic tank (PT)

Marginal effect (EP)

Marginal effect (CC)

Marginal effect (PT)

Const

0.699035***

(0.215109)

0.944383**

(0.456234)

0.600425***

(0.230787)

   

Sex

− 0.081628**

(0.038828)

0.0329918

(0.051195)

− 0.851995

(0.059994)

− 0.081628

0.329918

− 0.851995

Age

0.006071*

(0.003328)

0.004336

(0.006365)

0.012552**

(0.006150)

0.006071

0.004336

0.021552

Loedu

0.059853

(0.051778)

0.014690**

(0.007016)

0.075929

(0.137814)

0.059853

0.014690

0.075929

MS

0.002317

(0.038502)

− 0.110483

(0.079786)

0.035553

(0.095754)

0.002317

− 0.110483

0.355534

HHS

− 0.006345

(0.038224)

0.012930

(0.036218)

− 0.011898

(0.008926)

− 0.006345

0.012930

− 0.011898

REL

0.037042

(0.038224)

0.841597

(0.068971)

0.244353*

(0.123038)

0.037042

0.841587

0.244353

POCCUP

0.013553

(0.050137)

0.120017**

(0.055620)

0.115385

(0.082589)

0.013553

0.120017

0.115385

Sigma

-2 Log-likelihood

0.103190

34.540834

0.127086

9.422486

0.113870

0.898005

   
  1. Source: Computed from survey data; ***, ** and * are coefficients significant at 1%, %% and 10%, respectively. Figures in parenthesis are standard errors
Back to article page

Agriculture & Food Security

ISSN: 2048-7010