From: Factors affecting adoption of upland rice in Tselemti district, northern Ethiopia
No. | Variable | B value | SE | Wald | Sig. | Odds ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Age of the household head | 0.035 | 0.027 | 1.632 | 0.201 | 1.035 |
2 | Sex of the household head | − 0.513 | 1.029 | 0.249 | 0.618 | 0.599 |
3 | Level of education | 0.814 | 0.333 | 5.980 | 0.014** | 2.256 |
4 | Farm size | 0.166 | 0.602 | 0.076 | 0.783 | 1.181 |
5 | Livestock holding | 0.032 | 0.069 | 0.211 | 0.646 | 1.032 |
6 | Perception on rice yield | 2.468 | 0.750 | 10.822 | 0.001*** | 11.797 |
7 | Off-farm income | 1.113 | 0.643 | 2.997 | 0.083* | 3.044 |
8 | Access to credit | 0.981 | 0.515 | 3.627 | 0.057* | 2.666 |
9 | Market distance | − 0.084 | 0.050 | 2.838 | 0.092* | 0.919 |
10 | Contact with extension agent | 0.407 | 1.313 | 0.096 | 0.757 | 1.502 |
11 | Participation on field days | 1.755 | 0.585 | 8.996 | 0.003*** | 5.784 |
12 | Participation on training | 1.287 | 0.569 | 5.127 | 0.024** | 3.624 |
13 | Annual farm income | 0.000 | 0.0001 | 1.580 | 0.209 | 1.000 |
14 | Labor availability | 0.087 | 0.201 | 0.189 | 0.664 | 1.091 |
15 | Constant | − 8.035 | 2.397 | 11.239 | 0.001*** | 0.000 |
χ2 value | 100.541*** | |||||
− 2 log likelihood | 102.873 | |||||
Overall model predictions | 88% |