Skip to main content

Table 5 Rice technology adoption, management and commercialization

From: Drivers of rice production: evidence from five Sub-Saharan African countries

 

Reference year (%)

Reference year—2002 (%)

2002 (%)

Reference year—2008 (%)

2008 (%)

2002–2008 (%)

Lowland use

82 (281)

 

82 (317)

 

75 (268)

 

 Used lowland at both time points

 

70 (317)

 

44 (317)

 

51 (317)

 Stopped using lowland between the two time points

 

2 (317)

 

14 (317)

 

16 (317)

Started using lowland between the two time points

 

1 (317)

 

11 (317)

 

12 (317)

Tractor ploughing

14 (277)

 

23 (312)

 

23 (310)

 

 Used tractor plough at both time points

 

11 (312)

 

9 (310)

 

15 (310)

 Stopped using tractor plough between the two time points

 

2 (312)

 

4 (310)

 

8 (310)

 Started using tractor plough between the two time points

 

10 (312)

 

11 (310)

 

8 (310)

Fertilizer use

30 (274)

 

30 (301)

 

42 (256)

 

 Used fertilizer at both time points

 

18 (317)

 

18 (317)

 

22 (317)

 Stopped using fertilizer between the two time points

 

8 (317)

 

6 (317)

 

3 (317)

 Started using fertilizer between the two time points

 

7 (317)

 

12 (317)

 

11 (317)

Improved rice variety use

17 (275)

 

24 (307)

 

42 (315)

 

 Used improved rice variety at both time points

 

12 (307)

 

12 (315)

 

14 (315)

 Stopped using improved rice variety between the two time points

 

3 (307)

 

3 (315)

 

10 (315)

 Started using improved rice variety between the two time points

 

8 (307)

 

25 (315)

 

25 (315)

Commercialization (sold rice)

48 (308)

 

66 (315)

 

61 (314)

 

 Sold rice at both time points

 

40 (308)

 

36 (314)

 

47 (314)

 Stopped to sell or decreased the sale of rice between the two time points

 

15 (309)

 

12 (317)

 

40 (317)

 Started to sell or increased the sale of rice between the two time points

 

51 (309)

 

69 (317)

 

37 (317)

  1. Values in parentheses indicate number of cases