| N% | Enrichment | Nodules | Yield |
---|
| Contrasts |
20 | NeRo versus ½ Ne + Ro | | | | | | | | | | 0.83 | (0.07) | * |
| NeTu versus ½ Ne + Tu | 0.3% | (0.001) | + | | | | 1.18 | (0.10) | + | 0.64 | (0.06) | *** |
21 | NeSc versus ½ Ne + Sc | | | | 0.58 | (0.16) | * | | | | 1.24 | (0.16) | + |
| NeTu versus ½ Ne + Tu | | | | | | | 1.18 | (0.10) | + | | | |
| RoTu versus ½ Ro + Tu | 0.3% | (0.001) | * | | | | | | | 0.71 | (0.09) | ** |
- Nodules are expressed as the result of three experimental years (2019, 2020, 2021) according to Lorenzetti et al. [29] analysis
- The values represent the ratio between the mixture performances and that of its components (S.E.) For enrichment, nodules and yield when the ratio is < 1 the mixture perform worse than its components, if it is > 1 the mixture performs better than its components. For N%, when the ratio in positive the mixture performs better than its components, when negative the mixture perform worse than its components. + indicates statistical significance at p ≤ 0.1, * at p ≤ 0.05 level, ** at p ≤ 0.01, *** at p ≤ 0.001 (Estimated Marginal Means post hoc test). Ne = cv. Nera, Ro cv. = Robin, Sc = cv. Screziata, Tu = cv. Turca